Redefining critical autism studies: a more inclusive interpretation

Added on 30/10/2024

Type de contenu

Journal article of the type Theoretical development ( ; english)

Redefining critical autism studies: a more inclusive interpretation published in the journal "Disability & society" n°33, vol.6, 6 pages , doi: 10.1080/09687599.2018.1454380

*All co-authors had publicly identified as autistic. [Learn more about this mention]

Summary/Presentation

This article explores the definition of Critical Autism Studies and its inclusion in autistic scholarship. There has been critique of recent non-autistic literature for lacking autistic authorship, leading to doubts about its epistemological integrity due to misrepresentations of autistic culture and the neurodiversity movement. This article utilises the work of Arnold, Milton and O’Dell et al. to introduce an emancipatory definition to ensure the discipline is autistic led. In the process, we discuss the nature of autism studies and what constitutes critical literature. We propose Waltz’s interpretation of Critical Autism Studies as a working definition.

For your information:

(1) References in blue are resources listed on our site.

(2) Authors listed in this bibliography whose names are in color have published other resources referenced on the site. Clicking on the name allows you to see the list of resources they have published and shared on the site.

(3) Authors whose names are followed by an asterisk have publicly disclosed being autistic.


  • Anon. (2017). "Definition of Critical." Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster Incorporated: Springfield. (Source)

  • L. Arnold* (2013). "Introduction to the Second Edition." Autonomy, the Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies, 1(2).

  • L. Arnold* (2016). "Rethinking Autism, Diagnosis, Identity and Equality." Good Autism Practice, 17(2).

  • W. Arnold (2017). "Review of Re-Thinking Autism: Diagnosis, Identity and Equality (Timimi, Mallett Runswick-Cole Eds.)." Autonomy, the Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies, 1(5).

  • J. Davidson, M. Orsini, eds. (2013). "Worlds of Autism: Across the Spectrum of Neurological Difference." Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  • S. Graby* (2015). "Neurodiversity: Bridging the Gap between the Disabled People’s Movement and the Mental Health System Survivors’ Movement." In Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement, edited by H. Spandler, J. Anderson, B. Sapey. Bristol: Policy Press.

  • P. Hunt, ed. (1966). "Stigma: The Experience of Disability." London: Geoffrey Chapman.

  • K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallett, S. Timimi, eds. (2016). "Re-Thinking Autism: Diagnosis, Identity and Equality." London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

  • J. Sinclair (1993/2012). "Don’t Mourn for Us." Autonomy, the Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies, 1(1).

  • L. Strand (2017). "Charting Relations between Intersectionality Theory and the Neurodiversity Paradigm." Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(2). (Source)

  • M. Waltz (2014). "Worlds of Autism: Across the Spectrum of Neurological Difference." Disability & Society, 29(8). doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.934064

This resource is cited in 2 resources referenced on the site:


 
Summarize/Comment on/Translate this reference?