We must improve the low standards underlying "evidence-based practice"

Added on 30/06/2024

Type de contenu

Journal article of the type Editorial ( ; english)

We must improve the low standards underlying "evidence-based practice" published in the journal "Autism" n°27, vol.2, 5 pages , doi: 10.1177/13623613221146441

=> Unrestricted access and free

Summary/Presentation

Evidence-based practice is the process of identifying the best available evidence to make decisions about practices that should be deployed to support individuals in a given population (McKibbon, 1998, see Vivanti, 2022, for a review in relation to autism). Practices that meet a predefined set of evidentiary criteria are labeled “evidencebased practices” (EBPs1), to promote their adoption by service providers. A tenet of EBP is that the research used to designate EBPs should be rigorous, with the fewest risks of bias possible (Slavin, 2008). Several groups have developed EBP frameworks for conveying the extent to which intervention practices designed for autistic people are supported by evidence (e.g. National Autism Center, 2015; Reichow et al., 2008; Smith & Iadarola, 2015; Steinbrenner et al., 2020). These frameworks include algorithms for determining the number and types of studies showing an effect that must be available, and set standards for determining which studies qualify as evidence. The amount and type of evidence that should be required to designate EBPs is controversial, and autism researchers have debated about how standards should be operationalized in EBP frameworks since their initial development (Odom et al., 2005). Critics of autism EBP frameworks have argued that they: do not consider the scope of change indexed by outcome measures so that broad, developmental change and narrow, context-bound change are conflated (Sandbank et al., 2021)2; lead to an overestimation of effectiveness by tallying studies that show effects while ignoring gray literature, studies showing null effects, and studies showing iatrogenic effects (Sandbank et al., 2020; Slavin, 2008); and use taxonomies for categorizing practices that confuse practices and specific components of those practices (Ledford et al., 2021). The aim of this editorial is to point out another limitation of autism EBP frameworks, which is that research quality thresholds are much too low for making determinations about which interventions are likely to be efficacious. Low standards result in practices with questionable efficacy being labeled EBPs and promoted for use, and perpetuate the continued production of lowquality autism intervention research. How have EBP frameworks been used in autism research?

For your information:

(1) References in blue are resources listed on our site.

(2) Authors listed in this bibliography whose names are in color have published other resources referenced on the site. Clicking on the name allows you to see the list of resources they have published and shared on the site.

(3) Authors whose names are followed by an asterisk have publicly disclosed being autistic.


  • B. Boyd, A. Stahmer, S. Odom, A. Wallisch, M. Matheis (2022). "It's time to close the research to practice gap in autism: The need for implementation science". Autism, 26(3). doi:10.1177/13623613211064422

  • M. Bristol, D. Cohen, E. Jane Costello, M. Denckla, T. Eckberg, R. Kallen, H. Kraemer, C. Lord, R. Maurer, W. McIlvane, N. Minshew, M. Sigman, M. Anne Spence (1996). "State of the science in autism: Report to the National institutes of health". J Autism Dev Disord, 26(2). doi:10.1007/bf02172002

  • P. Cervantes, M. Matheis, J. Estabillo, D. Seag, K. Nelson, R. Peth-Pierce, K. Eaton Hoagwood, S. McCue Horwitz (2021). "Trends Over a Decade in NIH Funding for Autism Spectrum Disorder Services Research". J Autism Dev Disord, 51(8). doi:10.1007/s10803-020-04746-3

  • K. Dillenburger, L. McKerr, J. Jordan (2014). "Lost in Translation: Public Policies, Evidence-based Practice, and Autism Spectrum Disorder". International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 61(2). doi:10.1080/1034912x.2014.905059

  • L. Hampton, M. Sandbank (2022). "Keeping up with the evidence base: Survey of behavior professionals about Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions". Autism, 26(4). doi:10.1177/13623613211035233

  • P. Hyman, J. Napolitano, A. Diego, S. Patel, A. Flores, B. Grill, S. Narasimha Reddy, T. Garvey, T. Tomomasa (1990). "Antroduodenal Manometry in the Evaluation of Chronic Functional Gastrointestinal Symptoms". Pediatrics, 86(1). doi:10.1542/peds.86.1.39

  • J. Leaf, J. Cihon, R. Leaf, J. McEachin, N. Liu, N. Russell, L. Unumb, S. Shapiro, D. Khosrowshahi (2022). "Concerns About ABA-Based Intervention: An Evaluation and Recommendations". J Autism Dev Disord, 52(6). doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05137-y

  • J. Ledford, J. Lambert, E. Barton, K. Ayres (2021). "The Evidence Base for Interventions for Individuals With ASD: A Call to Improve Practice Conceptualization and Synthesis". Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl, 36(3). doi:10.1177/10883576211023349

  • C. Lord, T. Charman, A. Havdahl, P. Carbone, E. Anagnostou, B. Boyd, T. Carr, P. de Vries, C. Dissanayake, G. Divan, C. Freitag, M. Gotelli, C. Kasari, M. Knapp, P. Mundy, A. Plank, L. Scahill, C. Servili, P. Shattuck, E. Simonoff, A. Tepper Singer, V. Slonims, P. Wang, M. Celica Ysrraelit, R. Jellett, A. Pickles, J. Cusack*, P. Howlin, P. Szatmari, A. Holbrook, C. Toolan, J. McCauley (2022). "The Lancet Commission on the future of care and clinical research in autism". The Lancet, 399(10321). doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01541-5

  • S. Odom, E. Brantlinger, R. Gersten, R. Horner, B. Thompson, K. Harris (2005). "Research in Special Education: Scientific Methods and Evidence-Based Practices". Exceptional Children, 71(2). doi:10.1177/001440290507100201

  • S. Odom, W. Brown, T. Frey, N. Karasu, L. Lee Smith-Canter, P. Strain (2003). "Evidence-Based Practices for Young Children With Autism". Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl, 18(3). doi:10.1177/10883576030180030401

  • B. Reichow, E. Barton, D. Maggin (2018). "Development and applications of the single-case design risk of bias tool for evaluating single-case design research study reports". Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.008

  • B. Reichow, F. Volkmar, D. Cicchetti (2008). "Development of the Evaluative Method for Evaluating and Determining Evidence-Based Practices in Autism". J Autism Dev Disord, 38(7). doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0517-7

  • D. Sackett, W. Rosenberg, J. Gray, R. Haynes, W. Richardson (1996). "Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't". BMJ, 312(7023). doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71

  • A. Sam, A. Cox, M. Savage, V. Waters, S. Odom (2020). "Disseminating Information on Evidence-Based Practices for Children and Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: AFIRM". J Autism Dev Disord, 50(6). doi:10.1007/s10803-019-03945-x

  • R. Slavin (2008). "Perspectives on Evidence-Based Research in Education—What Works? Issues in Synthesizing Educational Program Evaluations". Educational Researcher, 37(1). doi:10.3102/0013189x08314117

  • T. Smith, S. Iadarola (2015). "Evidence Base Update for Autism Spectrum Disorder". Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(6). doi:10.1080/15374416.2015.1077448

  • A. Sridhar, J. Kuhn, S. Faja, M. Sabatos-DeVito, J. Nikolaeva, G. Dawson, C. Nelson, S. Webb, R. Bernier, S. Jeste, K. Chawarska, C. Sugar, F. Shic, A. Naples, J. Dziura, J. McPartland, t. ABC-CT Consortium (2022). "Patterns of intervention utilization among school-aged children on the autism spectrum: Findings from a multi-site research consortium". Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 94. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2022.101950

  • J. Virués-Ortega (2010). "Applied behavior analytic intervention for autism in early childhood: Meta-analysis, meta-regression and dose–response meta-analysis of multiple outcomes". Clinical Psychology Review, 30(4). doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.008

  • J. Virues-Ortega, F. Julio, R. Pastor-Barriuso (2013). "The TEACCH program for children and adults with autism: A meta-analysis of intervention studies". Clinical Psychology Review, 33(8). doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.005

  • G. Vivanti (2022). "What does it mean for an autism intervention to be evidence‐based?". Autism Research, 15(10). doi:10.1002/aur.2792

  • C. Wong, S. Odom, K. Hume, A. Cox, A. Fettig, S. Kucharczyk, M. Brock, J. Plavnick, V. Fleury, T. Schultz (2015). "Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comprehensive Review". J Autism Dev Disord, 45(7). doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z

  • G. Xu, L. Strathearn, B. Liu, M. O’Brien, T. Kopelman, J. Zhu, L. Snetselaar, W. Bao (2019). "Prevalence and Treatment Patterns of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the United States, 2016". JAMA Pediatr, 173(2). doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4208

This resource is cited in 1 resource referenced on the site:


 
Summarize/Comment on/Translate this reference?