Neurodiversity as politics

Added on 19/12/2024

Type de contenu

Journal article of the type Commentary ( ; english)

Neurodiversity as politics published in the journal "Human development" n°66, vol.2, 9 pages , doi: 10.1159/000524277

*One co-author has publicly identified as autistic. [Learn more about this mention]

Summary/Presentation

[First lines]

The debate around neurodiversity is itself diverse. As Dwyer (2022) puts it in his own contribution to this special issue of Human Development, there are multiple “neurodiversity approaches” deployed differently by different actors to different ends, even within the movement. This diversity presents some opportunities, allowing different groups to adapt the idea for their own purposes. Nonetheless, it can also lead to confusion, co-optation, acrimony, and other unintended consequences.
As such, in our commentary, we seek to situate the papers within the broader debate around neurodiversity, with the aim of highlighting key areas in which different voices within the neurodiversity movement hold divergent viewpoints. We also offer our own views as to how to resolve these conflicts, although our intent is to encourage debate and deliberate decision-making between these different “neurodiversity approaches” (the recognition of which represents a major contribution by Dwyer), not to insist that the movement’s future can only have one path. In highlighting these fissures, we hope to set the stage for a more robust dialogue on the future of neurodiversity in activism, academia, and beyond.

For your information:

(1) References in blue are resources listed on our site.

(2) Authors listed in this bibliography whose names are in color have published other resources referenced on the site. Clicking on the name allows you to see the list of resources they have published and shared on the site.

(3) Authors whose names are followed by an asterisk have publicly disclosed being autistic.


  • A. Asch, D. Barlevy (2012). "Disability and Genetics: A Disability Critique of Pre‐natal Testing and Pre‐implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)". doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0005212.pub2

  • Autistic Self Advocacy Network (2021, December 9). "Functioning labels harm autistic people". (Source)

  • A. Bailin (2019, June 6). "Clearing up some misconceptions about neurodiversity". (Source)

  • R. Chapman* (2021). "Negotiating the neurodiversity concept: Towards epistemic justice in conceptualising health". (Source)

  • P. Durbin-Westby (2012). "From the pro-neurodiversity trenches". (Source)

  • Ernst & Young (n.d.). "Neurodiversity-powered transformation". (Source)

  • D. Fein, M. Barton, I. Eigsti, E. Kelley, L. Naigles, R. Schultz, M. Stevens, M. Helt, A. Orinstein, M. Rosenthal, E. Troyb, K. Tyson (2013). "Optimal outcome in individuals with a history of autism". BDJ 214. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.299

  • A. Hart (2020). "A new alliance? The hearing voices movement and neurodiversity". In H. Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, N. Chown & A. Stenning (Eds.), Neurodiversity studies: A new critical paradigm, Routledge.

  • M. Jiujias, E. Kelley, L. Hall (2017). "Restricted, Repetitive Behaviors in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: A Comparative Review". Child Psychiatry & Human Development 48. doi:10.1007/s10578-017-0717-0

  • B. King (2019). "Fluoxetine and Repetitive Behaviors in Children and Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder.". JAMA doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11738

  • J. Kras (2009). "The 'Ransom Notes' Affair: When the Neurodiversity Movement Came of Age". Disability Studies Quarterly 30. doi:10.18061/dsq.v30i1.1065

  • J. Lewin (1986). "Emergence: Labeled Autistic". American Journal of Occupational Therapy 40. doi:10.5014/ajot.40.7.503b

  • Microsoft (n.d.). "Microsoft neurodiversity hiring program & FAQ". (Source)

  • L. Morrison (2005). "Talking Back to Psychiatry: The Psychiatric Consumer/Survivor/Ex-Patient Movement". doi:10.4324/9780203958704

  • National Council on Severe Autism (2021). "Calls for categorical recognition of severe autism in the DSM". (Source)

  • S. Pripas-Kapit (2019). "Historicizing Jim Sinclair's 'Don't Mourn for Us': A Cultural and Intellectual History of Neurodiversity's First Manifesto". Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0_2

  • E. Radulski (2022). "Conceptualising Autistic Masking, Camouflaging, and Neurotypical Privilege: Towards a Minority Group Model of Neurodiversity". Human Development 66. doi:10.1159/000524122

  • S. Rosa (2021). "Creating a 'profound autism' category is segregation, not progress". (Source)

  • J. Sinclair* (2005, January). "Autism network international: The development of a community and its culture". (Source)

  • P. Solvang, H. Haualand (2014). "Accessibility and diversity: Deaf space in action". Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 16. doi:10.1080/15017419.2012.761158

  • T. Thomas (2021, April 2). "Pilot increases neurodiversity in government". (Source)

  • M. Zajic, H. Brown* (2022). "Measuring Autistic Writing Skills: Combining Perspectives from Neurodiversity Advocates, Autism Researchers, and Writing Theories". Human Development 66. doi:10.1159/000524015


 
Summarize/Comment on/Translate this reference?